山东长清灵岩寺宋代罗汉像彩绘分析研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.山东省文物保护修复中心,山东济南 250014;2.北京科技大学,科技史与文化遗产研究院,北京 100083;3.国家文物局水下文化遗产保护中心,北京 100192;4.山东大学文化遗产研究院,山东济南 250100)

作者简介:

王传昌(1963—),男,山东省文物保护修复中心,研究方向为文化遗产保护,E-mail:wangcc1963@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Scientific study of the Song Dynasty polychrome Arhat statues from the Magic Cliff Monastery in Jinan
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Shandong Provincial Center of Cultural Relics Protection, Jinan 250014, China;2. Academy of History of Science & Technology and Cultural Heritage, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;3. National Center of Underwater Culture Heritage, Beijing 100192, China;4. Institute of Cultural Heritage, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    山东省济南市长清区灵岩寺彩绘罗汉像是我国宋代泥塑罗汉的代表作,具有极高的历史、艺术和科学价值。但罗汉像保存现状较差,彩塑存在颜料脱落、残损、酥碱等病害,亟待保护修复。为此,本工作选取彩绘脱落严重的两尊宋代彩塑罗汉像,利用光学显微镜(OM)、拉曼光谱(Raman)、扫描电子显微镜与能谱仪(SEM-EDS)等分析其彩绘颜料样品。结果表明,彩绘罗汉像从塑制之初至今,经过数次彩绘,可确定的多达六次。黑色颜料为炭黑(C);红色颜料为朱砂(HgS),铅丹(Pb3O4),以及朱砂、铁红(Fe2O3)和方解石(CaCO3)混合物;绿色颜料为巴黎绿(Cu(C2H3O2)·3Cu(AsO2)2)和舍勒绿(Cu(AsO2)2),还发现有斜氯铜矿(CuCl(OH)3)及其与铅白(2PbCO3·Pb(OH)2)的混合物;橙色颜料为铅铬黄(PbCrO4)和铅丹混合物;蓝色颜料为蓝铜矿(2CuCO3·Cu(OH)2),人工合成群青(Na3CaAl3Si3O12S);白色颜料为铅白和方解石;黄色颜料为铁黄(FeO(OH));金色为金箔(Au);沥粉的主要成分是方解石。白色底层为铅白和以硅、铝、钙为主的细白土。彩塑罗汉像重绘过程中,保持了将细白土作为底层和衣领镶边沥粉贴金的传统。彩绘颜料所用铅铬黄、巴黎绿、舍勒绿表明,彩塑罗汉像最近一次彩绘在清末之际,与文献记载相符,且这些人工颜料应是西方舶来之物。本分析研究结果为灵岩寺罗汉像艺术史研究提供了丰富信息,同时为保护修复工作开展提供了可靠依据。

    Abstract:

    The Song Dynasty polychrome Arhat statues from the Magic Cliff Monastery, praised as No.1 statues throughout China, are highly valuable in terms of archaeology, art and technology. In this work, we analyzed the pigments of two selected statues using optical microscopy (OM), Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS).It was found that the statues had been repainted several times, at least six. The pigments used are:carbon black for the black pigment; cinnabar, lead red and a mixture of cinnabar, mars red and calcite for red pigments; emerald green, Scheele’s green, clinoatacamite and a mixture of clinoatacamite and lead white for green pigments; a mixture of lead chrome yellow and lead red for orange pigment; azurite and ultramarine for blue pigments; lead white and calcite for white pigment; mars yellow for yellow pigment. The gelled patterning was made of lime. The components of the white layer are lead white and white soil with the elements of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al) and calcium (Ca). It can be concluded that using white soil for white layers and repainting collar edges by gelled patterning and gilding are traditions of the monastery. Judging from the presence of modern colorants, synthetic emerald green, chrome yellow and Scheele’s green, it is also suggested that the last repainting may have been executed at the end of the Qing Dynasty.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-22
  • 最后修改日期:2018-04-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-01-11
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
主办单位:上海博物馆 编辑出版:《文物保护与考古科学》编辑委员会
地址:上海市徐汇区龙吴路1118号,上海博物馆文物保护科技中心,《文物保护与考古科学》编辑部
电话:021-54362886 传真:021-54363740 E-mail:wwbhykgkx@163.com
文物保护与考古科学 ® 2024 版权所有
沪ICP备10003390号-3
沪公网安备 31010102005301号
关闭